Ethical considerations: Cracking is illegal if the user doesn't own the software or if the purpose is to circumvent licensing. But for educational purposes or to preserve software, it's a gray area. The write-up should mention that.
The reverse engineering process would involve loading the executable into a disassembler or debugger, setting breakpoints on key functions, stepping through the code to find where checks are performed (like checking for a license file, checking expiration date). Then patching the code to skip those checks.
Another approach is searching for strings related to licensing or time-limited usage. In a hex editor, searching for ASCII strings like "Time-limited demo", "Register to remove time limit", or "Contact sales" could point to the location where the code is implemented.
Another angle: Maybe Dosprn is a specific version or variant of DOSPRINT, or a different program entirely. The user might be referring to a specific program they encountered. In that case, the write-up needs to be as detailed or as generic as possible to cover common methods.
Potential issues: If DOSPRN is actually freeware, then there's no need to crack it. The cracker should confirm the software's licensing terms before proceeding. If it's commercial, then the actions described are for educational purposes only and should not be used to violate the software's license agreement.
For example, if DOSPRINT checks for a license key, the cracker would find the code responsible for that check using the debugger, then NOP out the jump instruction that would exit if the check fails. Or change a compare instruction to always pass.